-
R Turbeville
- 5 stars Rating: 98
927 votes total - (15675)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
wps88 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
4363 votes total - The Realist
- (15687)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
wps88 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
4363 votes total - The Realist
- (15687)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hogs of Anarchy ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
96 votes total - (1154)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
wps88 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
4363 votes total - The Realist
- (15687)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Psu36 said...
He is responsible for what his former staff does on campus? How is that remotely the responsibility of a head coach under any circumstances? Also he did make a phone call when he called the head of campus police to report the incident. At PSU the campus police acts in the same capacity as the state or local police would elsewhere with arresting and investigative power.
Do I wish he would have followed up with the CP later? Absolutely. But to say that JoePa was responsible for the actions of someone who he had no longer any authority over in any capacity lacks logic and realistic understanding of the situation. He did in fact report it within a 24-48 hour time frame of the incident.
If the now Gov of PA, then the Attorney General, had two years to investigate and could not make an arrest, how then is JoePa, a football coach, so highly responsible (having already reported it the arresting authority)for letting a sick, sick man on campus . This man was a tenured professor and by contract allowed to use the facilities he used and barring him would not be possible unless legal action took place, which I already stated the AG had two years to do so and failed.
The Attorney General knew about Sandusky, the head of campus police knew about it, the AD knew about it, the president of the university even found out. But JoePa is still the one held most responsible, despite people in higher authority and with power applicable to the situation having knowledge of the same things he did?
Again do I wish he had followed up with CP later in the process ? HELL YES! But he wouldn't have had to if other people had done what they were supposed to (as he did going UP the chain of command and alerting CP).
Any one of these men should have done more, they didn't. The completely absolve Joepa is naive, but to ruin his legacy in this manner is irresponsible and damaging to a lot more than just football in the Northeast.
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/7770996/in-wake-joe-paterno-death-sandusky-sex-abuse-scandal-power-struggle-spread-penn-state-state-capital
-
Psu36 said...
He DID NOT give Sandusky access... The UNIVERSITY gave JS the keys and office as part of his retirement package. I really do know understand why people don't understand that JoePa had NOOO say over when and where Sandusky had access to university property... he didn't, a contract between a state run university and a former employee is legally binding and not even JoePa could "order" it away.
It was in his contract to get an office and have access, that contract had nothing to do with JoePa. Therefore, JoePa did not "continue to give JS access".
If anyone "Continued to give Sandusky access" it was Schultz who was the head of campus police, knew about the allegations and let JS wonder the campus unmonitored.Should Joe have contacted Schultz later, yes.
And call CNN? Why would you call CNN after the first and only allegation (that you knew of) to a person who was supposedly a saint in the community. You call the authorities... let them investigate and take it from there. You do not ruin a former employee's reputation in that manner without a police investigation.
And yes he should have followed up to make sure that an investigation took place (which is never did, even though Joe had wrongfully assumed it had).InMyLifetimeFSU
- 4 stars Rating: 76
25 votes total - (67)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars







Paterno statement on Sandusky